These tests would panic;
- in WithRLimits(), because HostConfig was not set;
https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/470ae8422fc6f1845288eb7572253b08f1e6edf8/daemon/oci_linux.go#L46-L47
- in daemon.mergeUlimits(), because daemon.configStore was not set;
https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/470ae8422fc6f1845288eb7572253b08f1e6edf8/daemon/oci_linux.go#L1069
This panic was not discovered because the current version of runc/libcontainer that we vendor
would not always return false for `apparmor.IsEnabled()` when running docker-in-docker or if
`apparmor_parser` is not found. Starting with v1.0.0-rc93 of libcontainer, this is no longer
the case (changed in https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/bfb4ea1b1b2452bb3ddc8183b35dec4914bb5128)
This patch;
- changes the tests to initialize Daemon.configStore and Container.HostConfig
- Combines TestExecSetPlatformOpt and TestExecSetPlatformOptPrivileged into a new test
(TestExecSetPlatformOptAppArmor)
- Runs the test both if AppArmor is enabled and if not (in which case it tests
that the container's AppArmor profile is left empty).
- Adds a FIXME comment for a possible bug in execSetPlatformOpts, which currently
prefers custom profiles over "privileged".
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
| ... | ... |
@@ -8,46 +8,83 @@ import ( |
| 8 | 8 |
"github.com/containerd/containerd/pkg/apparmor" |
| 9 | 9 |
containertypes "github.com/docker/docker/api/types/container" |
| 10 | 10 |
"github.com/docker/docker/container" |
| 11 |
+ "github.com/docker/docker/daemon/config" |
|
| 11 | 12 |
"github.com/docker/docker/daemon/exec" |
| 12 | 13 |
specs "github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec/specs-go" |
| 13 | 14 |
"gotest.tools/v3/assert" |
| 14 | 15 |
) |
| 15 | 16 |
|
| 16 |
-func TestExecSetPlatformOpt(t *testing.T) {
|
|
| 17 |
- if !apparmor.HostSupports() {
|
|
| 18 |
- t.Skip("requires AppArmor to be enabled")
|
|
| 17 |
+func TestExecSetPlatformOptAppArmor(t *testing.T) {
|
|
| 18 |
+ appArmorEnabled := apparmor.HostSupports() |
|
| 19 |
+ |
|
| 20 |
+ tests := []struct {
|
|
| 21 |
+ doc string |
|
| 22 |
+ privileged bool |
|
| 23 |
+ appArmorProfile string |
|
| 24 |
+ expectedProfile string |
|
| 25 |
+ }{
|
|
| 26 |
+ {
|
|
| 27 |
+ doc: "default options", |
|
| 28 |
+ expectedProfile: defaultAppArmorProfile, |
|
| 29 |
+ }, |
|
| 30 |
+ {
|
|
| 31 |
+ doc: "custom profile", |
|
| 32 |
+ appArmorProfile: "my-custom-profile", |
|
| 33 |
+ expectedProfile: "my-custom-profile", |
|
| 34 |
+ }, |
|
| 35 |
+ {
|
|
| 36 |
+ doc: "privileged container", |
|
| 37 |
+ privileged: true, |
|
| 38 |
+ expectedProfile: unconfinedAppArmorProfile, |
|
| 39 |
+ }, |
|
| 40 |
+ {
|
|
| 41 |
+ doc: "privileged container, custom profile", |
|
| 42 |
+ privileged: true, |
|
| 43 |
+ appArmorProfile: "my-custom-profile", |
|
| 44 |
+ expectedProfile: "my-custom-profile", |
|
| 45 |
+ // FIXME: execSetPlatformOpts prefers custom profiles over "privileged", |
|
| 46 |
+ // which looks like a bug (--privileged on the container should |
|
| 47 |
+ // disable apparmor, seccomp, and selinux); see the code at: |
|
| 48 |
+ // https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/46cdcd206c56172b95ba5c77b827a722dab426c5/daemon/exec_linux.go#L32-L40 |
|
| 49 |
+ // expectedProfile: unconfinedAppArmorProfile, |
|
| 50 |
+ }, |
|
| 19 | 51 |
} |
| 20 |
- d := &Daemon{}
|
|
| 21 |
- c := &container.Container{AppArmorProfile: "my-custom-profile"}
|
|
| 22 |
- ec := &exec.Config{}
|
|
| 23 |
- p := &specs.Process{}
|
|
| 24 |
- |
|
| 25 |
- err := d.execSetPlatformOpt(c, ec, p) |
|
| 26 |
- assert.NilError(t, err) |
|
| 27 |
- assert.Equal(t, "my-custom-profile", p.ApparmorProfile) |
|
| 28 |
-} |
|
| 29 | 52 |
|
| 30 |
-// TestExecSetPlatformOptPrivileged verifies that `docker exec --privileged` |
|
| 31 |
-// does not disable AppArmor profiles. Exec currently inherits the `Privileged` |
|
| 32 |
-// configuration of the container. See https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/31773#discussion_r105586900 |
|
| 33 |
-// |
|
| 34 |
-// This behavior may change in future, but test for the behavior to prevent it |
|
| 35 |
-// from being changed accidentally. |
|
| 36 |
-func TestExecSetPlatformOptPrivileged(t *testing.T) {
|
|
| 37 |
- if !apparmor.HostSupports() {
|
|
| 38 |
- t.Skip("requires AppArmor to be enabled")
|
|
| 53 |
+ d := &Daemon{configStore: &config.Config{}}
|
|
| 54 |
+ |
|
| 55 |
+ // Currently, `docker exec --privileged` inherits the Privileged configuration |
|
| 56 |
+ // of the container, and does not disable AppArmor. |
|
| 57 |
+ // See https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/31773#discussion_r105586900 |
|
| 58 |
+ // |
|
| 59 |
+ // This behavior may change in future, but to verify the current behavior, |
|
| 60 |
+ // we run the test both with "exec" and "exec --privileged", which should |
|
| 61 |
+ // both give the same result. |
|
| 62 |
+ for _, execPrivileged := range []bool{false, true} {
|
|
| 63 |
+ for _, tc := range tests {
|
|
| 64 |
+ tc := tc |
|
| 65 |
+ doc := tc.doc |
|
| 66 |
+ if !appArmorEnabled {
|
|
| 67 |
+ // no profile should be set if the host does not support AppArmor |
|
| 68 |
+ doc += " (apparmor disabled)" |
|
| 69 |
+ tc.expectedProfile = "" |
|
| 70 |
+ } |
|
| 71 |
+ if execPrivileged {
|
|
| 72 |
+ doc += " (exec privileged)" |
|
| 73 |
+ } |
|
| 74 |
+ t.Run(doc, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
| 75 |
+ c := &container.Container{
|
|
| 76 |
+ AppArmorProfile: tc.appArmorProfile, |
|
| 77 |
+ HostConfig: &containertypes.HostConfig{
|
|
| 78 |
+ Privileged: tc.privileged, |
|
| 79 |
+ }, |
|
| 80 |
+ } |
|
| 81 |
+ ec := &exec.Config{Privileged: execPrivileged}
|
|
| 82 |
+ p := &specs.Process{}
|
|
| 83 |
+ |
|
| 84 |
+ err := d.execSetPlatformOpt(c, ec, p) |
|
| 85 |
+ assert.NilError(t, err) |
|
| 86 |
+ assert.Equal(t, p.ApparmorProfile, tc.expectedProfile) |
|
| 87 |
+ }) |
|
| 88 |
+ } |
|
| 39 | 89 |
} |
| 40 |
- d := &Daemon{}
|
|
| 41 |
- c := &container.Container{AppArmorProfile: "my-custom-profile"}
|
|
| 42 |
- ec := &exec.Config{Privileged: true}
|
|
| 43 |
- p := &specs.Process{}
|
|
| 44 |
- |
|
| 45 |
- err := d.execSetPlatformOpt(c, ec, p) |
|
| 46 |
- assert.NilError(t, err) |
|
| 47 |
- assert.Equal(t, "my-custom-profile", p.ApparmorProfile) |
|
| 48 |
- |
|
| 49 |
- c.HostConfig = &containertypes.HostConfig{Privileged: true}
|
|
| 50 |
- err = d.execSetPlatformOpt(c, ec, p) |
|
| 51 |
- assert.NilError(t, err) |
|
| 52 |
- assert.Equal(t, unconfinedAppArmorProfile, p.ApparmorProfile) |
|
| 53 | 90 |
} |