Browse code

Update patch release process

Signed-off-by: Arnaud Porterie <arnaud.porterie@docker.com>

Arnaud Porterie authored on 2016/03/09 09:59:15
Showing 1 changed files
... ...
@@ -51,3 +51,18 @@ review sessions take place on a weekly basis, more frequent if needed:
51 51
 > a different procedure. Security releases are developed in a private
52 52
 > repository, released and tested under embargo before they become
53 53
 > publicly available.
54
+
55
+## Deciding on the content of a patch release
56
+
57
+When the criteria for moving forward with a patch release are met, the release
58
+manager will decide on the exact content of the release.
59
+
60
+- Fixes to all P0 issues *must* be included in the release.
61
+- Fixes to *some* P1, P2, and P3 issues *may* be included as part of the patch
62
+  release depending on the severity of the issue and the risk associated with
63
+  the patch.
64
+
65
+Any code delivered as part of a patch release should make life easier for a
66
+significant amount of users with zero chance of degrading anybody's experience.
67
+A good rule of thumb for that is to limit cherry-picking to small patches, which
68
+fix well-understood issues, and which come with verifiable tests.