From 8f3308ae10ec9ad0dd4edfb46fde53a0e1e19b34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 13:17:56 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix AppArmor not being applied to Exec processes Exec processes do not automatically inherit AppArmor profiles from the container. This patch sets the AppArmor profile for the exec process. Before this change: apparmor_parser -q -r <<EOF #include <tunables/global> profile deny-write flags=(attach_disconnected) { #include <abstractions/base> file, network, deny /tmp/** w, capability, } EOF docker run -dit --security-opt "apparmor=deny-write" --name aa busybox docker exec aa sh -c 'mkdir /tmp/test' (no error) With this change applied: docker exec aa sh -c 'mkdir /tmp/test' mkdir: can't create directory '/tmp/test': Permission denied Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl> --- daemon/exec_linux.go | 3 +++ daemon/exec_linux_test.go | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+) create mode 100644 daemon/exec_linux_test.go diff -Naurp docker-ce-17.06-orig/components/engine/daemon/exec_linux.go docker-ce-17.06-modified/components/engine/daemon/exec_linux.go --- docker-ce-17.06-orig/components/engine/daemon/exec_linux.go 2017-07-14 20:34:55.000000000 -0700 +++ docker-ce-17.06-modified/components/engine/daemon/exec_linux.go 2018-09-10 12:16:00.218939188 -0700 @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ func execSetPlatformOpt(c *container.Con if c.AppArmorProfile != "" { appArmorProfile = c.AppArmorProfile } else if c.HostConfig.Privileged { + // `docker exec --privileged` does not currently disable AppArmor + // profiles. Privileged configuration of the container is inherited appArmorProfile = "unconfined" } else { appArmorProfile = "docker-default" @@ -45,6 +47,10 @@ func execSetPlatformOpt(c *container.Con return err } } + + // Note that libcontainerd.Process.ApparmorProfile is + // a *pointer* to a string. + p.ApparmorProfile = &appArmorProfile } return nil } diff -Naurp docker-ce-17.06-orig/components/engine/daemon/exec_linux_test.go docker-ce-17.06-modified/components/engine/daemon/exec_linux_test.go --- docker-ce-17.06-orig/components/engine/daemon/exec_linux_test.go 1969-12-31 16:00:00.000000000 -0800 +++ docker-ce-17.06-modified/components/engine/daemon/exec_linux_test.go 2018-09-10 11:23:39.624251028 -0700 @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +// +build linux + +package daemon + +import ( + "testing" + + containertypes "github.com/docker/docker/api/types/container" + "github.com/docker/docker/container" + "github.com/docker/docker/daemon/exec" + "github.com/gotestyourself/gotestyourself/assert" + "github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/apparmor" + "github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec/specs-go" +) + +func TestExecSetPlatformOpt(t *testing.T) { + if !apparmor.IsEnabled() { + t.Skip("requires AppArmor to be enabled") + } + d := &Daemon{} + c := &container.Container{AppArmorProfile: "my-custom-profile"} + ec := &exec.Config{} + p := &specs.Process{} + + err := d.execSetPlatformOpt(c, ec, p) + assert.NilError(t, err) + assert.Equal(t, "my-custom-profile", p.ApparmorProfile) +} + +// TestExecSetPlatformOptPrivileged verifies that `docker exec --privileged` +// does not disable AppArmor profiles. Exec currently inherits the `Privileged` +// configuration of the container. See https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/31773#discussion_r105586900 +// +// This behavior may change in future, but test for the behavior to prevent it +// from being changed accidentally. +func TestExecSetPlatformOptPrivileged(t *testing.T) { + if !apparmor.IsEnabled() { + t.Skip("requires AppArmor to be enabled") + } + d := &Daemon{} + c := &container.Container{AppArmorProfile: "my-custom-profile"} + ec := &exec.Config{Privileged: true} + p := &specs.Process{} + + err := d.execSetPlatformOpt(c, ec, p) + assert.NilError(t, err) + assert.Equal(t, "my-custom-profile", p.ApparmorProfile) + + c.HostConfig = &containertypes.HostConfig{Privileged: true} + err = d.execSetPlatformOpt(c, ec, p) + assert.NilError(t, err) + assert.Equal(t, "unconfined", p.ApparmorProfile) +}